This is just atrocious.Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart have been happily filming Breaking Dawn.
They’re smiling. They’re laughing. They’re together.
And that’s a major problem for outlets that have been sniping at them for months (and even years).
So one tabloid took it upon itself to concoct one of the most absurd articles we’ve seen in ages.
Now magazine uses a string of already debunked rumors, treats them as facts, and then says the couple plans to get married to fix things.
According to the tabloid’s “insider,” whose only insight seems to come from old back issues of equally miserable outlets, Stewart was “in tears” over the summer, convinced Pattinson was with his Water For Elephants costar Reese Witherspoon.
No, she wasn’t.
Now then claims it was Pattinson who was the one “getting really moody” when he heard about Stewart and his pal Tom Sturridge filming On The Road.
No, he wasn’t – there was never a love triangle with Sturridge.
Since Now wants everyone to believe that Pattinson and Stewart’s relationship teeters on the brink of disaster anytime one of them boards a plane without the other, it offers this gem:
The couple is “looking at all options — including marriage — to keep the peace during their absences.”
Says a so-called “spy” for the tab, “Kristen’s even suggested they could get married to show how committed they are,” and while Pattinson thinks “they’re too young,” he “doesn’t want to lose her.”
So that’s what it’s come to for the media.
After trying forever to make the pair’s relationship appear wounded, the press claims Stewart and Pattinson must rush to use marriage as a Band-Aid.
It’s obvious that there really isn’t any “reality” anymore when it comes to this kind of journalism. It’s just connecting various dots in whatever way best captures that week’s agenda.
And this specific article manages to be totally wrong about the past, the future, and… right Now.
source gossipcop
No comments:
Post a Comment